Brain, other CNS and intracranial tumours risk factors

Coronavirus (COVID-19)

We have created a central resources hub for Health Professionals which hosts all of our CRUK resources and further materials to help with managing the pandemic. We are updating the information as guidance changes. There is also a page specifically for patients on our about cancer hub.

Health Professional COVID-19 and Cancer Hub

Preventable cases

Brain and other CNS tumour cases are preventable, UK, 2015

Caused by obesity

Brain and other CNS tumour cases caused by overweight and obesity, UK, 2015


Caused by radiation

Brain and other CNS tumour cases caused by ionising radiation, UK, 2015


The estimated lifetime risk of being diagnosed with a brain, other CNS or intracranial tumour is 1 in 69 (1%) for males, and 1 in 65 (2%) for females born after 1960 in the UK.[1]

These figures take account of the possibility that someone can have more than one diagnosis of a brain, other CNS or intracranial tumour in their lifetime (‘Adjusted for Multiple Primaries’ (AMP) method).[2]

The estimated lifetime risk of being diagnosed with a brain, other CNS or intracranial tumour is 1 in 69 (1%) for males, and 1 in 65 (2%) for females born after 1960 in the UK


  1. Lifetime risk estimates calculated by the Statistical Information Team at Cancer Research UK. Based on Office for National Statistics (ONS) 2016-based Life expectancies and population projections. Accessed December 2017, and Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, Moitt N. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Projections in the UK Until 2035. Brit J Cancer 2016. 
  2. Sasieni PD, Shelton J, Ormiston-Smith N, et al. What is the lifetime risk of developing cancer?: The effect of adjusting for multiple primaries. Br J Cancer, 2011. 105(3): p. 460-5.

About this data

Data is for UK, past and projected cancer incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality rates for those born in 1961, ICD-10 C70-C72, C75.1-C75.3, D32-D33, D35.2-D35.4, D42-D43, D44.3-D44.5.

The calculations used past and projected cancer incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality rates for those born in 1961 to project risk over the lifetime of those born in 1961 (cohort method).[1] Projections are based on observed incidence and mortality rates and therefore implicitly include changes in cancer risk factors, diagnosis and treatment.

Last reviewed:

3% of brain and other CNS tumour (ICD-10 C70-C72) cases in the UK are preventable.[1] The proportion of lifestyle-associated benign and uncertain behaviour brain and other CNS tumours, and other intracranial tumours, has not been estimated.

Brain and other CNS cancer risk is associated with a number of risk factors.[2,3]

Brain and Other CNS Cancer Risk Factors

  Increases risk Decreases risk
'Sufficient' or 'convincing' evidence
  • X-radiation, gamma radiation
  • Body fatness (meningioma only)
'Limited' or 'Probable' evidence
  • Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (including from wireless phones) (glioma and acoustic neuroma only)

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classification. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) classification does not include brain, other CNS and intracranial tumours because they are not generally recognised to have a relationship to food, nutrition, and physical activity.

See also

Want to generate bespoke preventable cancers stats statements? Download our interactive statement generator.

Find out more about the definitions and evidence for this data

Learn how attributable risk is calculated


  1. Brown KF, Rumgay H, Dunlop C, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to known risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the UK overall in 2015. British Journal of Cancer 2018.
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. List of Classifications by cancer sites with sufficient or limited evidence in humans, Volumes 1 to 122. Accessed August 2018.
  3. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al. Body Fatness and Cancer--Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):794-8.
  4. World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Findings & Reports. Accessed September 2017.
Last reviewed:

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies the role of this risk factor in meningioma development.[1] 2% of brain and other CNS tumour cases in the UK are caused by overweight and obesity.[2]

Meningioma risk is 60% higher in women who are obese (body mass index [BMI] 30+), compared with those of a normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), a meta-analysis showed.[3] Meningioma risk in men is not associated with BMI, a meta-analysis showed.[3] Glioma risk is not associated with BMI meta-analysis showed.[3]

Childhood CNS tumour risk is 14% higher in children born weighing 4kg+, compared with those born lighter, a meta-analysis showed.[4] Astrocytoma risk is 22% higher, and embryonal tumour risk is 16% higher, in children born weighing 4kg+, compared with those born lighter.[4]

UK portrait version shown here. Country versions, cancers caused by other risk factors, and landscape formats are available for free from our cancer risk publications.

Last reviewed:

Family history

Having a family history of CNS tumours is associated with increased risk of developing a brain tumour, pooled analyses have shown.[1,2] Having a parent with a CNS tumour is associated with a 70% increased risk of being diagnosed with a brain or CNS tumour oneself, compared with the general population, and having a sibling diagnosed is associated with a doubling of risk.[1,2

Those with any first-degree relative (parent, sibling or child) diagnosed with glioma have a 77% increased risk of developing glioma themselves, and a 2.2- to 2.6-fold risk increase if the affected relative is a sibling.[2,3]

Having a parent or sibling with meningioma confers a more than doubled (130% increased) risk of meningioma.[2

The magnitude of risk increases associated with family history varies by brain tumour subtype, but small sample sizes for these less common tumours preclude firm conclusions.[2

Neurofibromatoses (NF)

Neurofibromatoses (NF) Open a glossary item are a group of genetic conditions in which benign (non-invasive) growths affect the nervous system. NF type 1 (NF1) is thought to affect around 1 in 2,700 live births in the UK, whilst NF type 2 (NF2) affects around 1 in 33,000.[4]

The risk of brain and CNS tumours is at least 23-43 times higher in NF1 patients than in the general population.[5,6] The risk of CNS tumours excluding those in the brain may be considerably higher.[6] Relative risk of brain tumours in NF1 patients increases with patient age.[7] Most NF1-associated brain tumours are gliomas.

Both children and adults with NF1 have an increased risk of astrocytoma, with the tumour grade often higher in adults than children.[7] 5-25% of children with NF1 develop optic pathway gliomas.[7]

NF2 patients are commonly diagnosed with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas). These affect 90-95% of NF2 patients, and they are typically benign but can cause hearing impairment.[8] Meningiomas affect 45-58% of NF2 patients, and usually arise at a younger age in these patients than in the general population.[8]

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) Open a glossary item causes benign tumors to grow in the brain and elsewhere. The prevalence of TSC is estimated at around 1 in 25,000.[9,10] Up to 20% of TSC patients develop subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas.[11]

Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Li-Fraumeni syndrome Open a glossary item is a very rare genetic condition associated with increased risk of early-onset brain tumours and other cancer types. Astrocytomas, glioblastomas, medulloblastomas, and choroid plexus carcinomas are the most common brain tumours seen in this population.[12]

Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome

Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome Open a glossary item is thought to occur in around 1 in 43,000 live births in the UK.[2] Haemangioblastomas of the brain or spinal cord occur in 60-80% of people with this condition.[13]

Turner syndrome

Turner syndrome Open a glossary item affects around 1 in 2,000 female live births.[14] The risk of CNS tumours is around 4 times higher for Turner syndrome patients than the general population, with particularly increased risks of meningioma and childhood brain tumours.[15]

Turcot’s syndrome

Turcot’s syndrome is associated with both brain and bowel tumours. Turcot’s syndrome type 1 is associated with early-onset gliomas, whilst type 2 is associated with medulloblastoma.[16]

Gorlin syndrome

Gorlin syndrome Open a glossary item (nevoid basal cell carcinoma) is thought to occur in around 1 in 15,000 live births in the UK.[2] Around 5-10% of people with this condition develop medulloblastomas.[17]


  1. Hemminki K, Tretli S, Olsen JH, et al. Familial risks in nervous system tumours: joint Nordic study. Br J Cancer 2010; 102(12):1786-90.
  2. Hemminki K, Tretli S, Sundquist J, et al. Familial risks in nervous-system tumours: a histology-specific analysis from Sweden and Norway. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(5):481-88.

  3. Scheurer ME, Etzel CJ, Liu M, et al. Familial aggregation of glioma: a pooled analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172(10):1099-107.

  4. Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, et al. Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: Estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A(2):327-32.
  5. Walker L, Thompson D, Easton D, et al. A prospective study of neurofibromatosis type 1 cancer incidence in the UK. Br J Cancer 2006; 95(2):233-38.
  6. Seminog OO, Goldacre MJ. Risk of benign tumours of nervous system, and of malignant neoplasms, in people with neurofibromatosis: population-based record-linkage study. Br J Cancer 2013 15; 108(1):193-8.
  7. Brems H, Beert E, de Ravel T, et al. Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of malignant tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(5):508-15.
  8. Asthagiri AR, Parry DM, Butman JA, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 2. Lancet; 373(9679):1974-86.
  9. Devlin LA, Shepherd CH, Crawford H, et al. Tuberous sclerosis complex: clinical features, diagnosis, and prevalence within Northern Ireland. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48(6):495-99.
  10. Hong CH, Darling TN, Lee CH. Prevalence of tuberous sclerosis complex in Taiwan: a national population-based study. Neuroepidemiology 2009; 33(4):335-41.
  11. Adriaensen MEAPM, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Stijnen T, et al. Prevalence of subependymal giant cell tumors in patients with tuberous sclerosis and a review of the literature. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16(6):691-96.
  12. Schneider K, Zelly K, Nicholas KE ,Garber J. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. GeneReviews™. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, 1999, accessed December 2018 .
  13. Maher ER, Neumann HPH, Richard S. von Hippel-Lindau disease: A clinical and scientific review. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19(6):617-23.
  14. Stochholm K, Juul S, Juel K, et al. Prevalence, Incidence, Diagnostic Delay, and Mortality in Turner Syndrome. J Clin Endocr Metab 2006; 91(10):3897-902.
  15. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, et al. Cancer incidence in women with Turner syndrome in Great Britain: a national cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9(3):239-46.
  16. Paraf F, Jothy S, Van Meir EG. Brain tumor-polyposis syndrome: two genetic diseases? J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(7):2744-58.
  17. Lo Muzio L. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (Gorlin syndrome). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008; 3:32.
Last reviewed:

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies the role of this risk factor in cancer development.[1] Less than 1% of brain and other CNS tumour cases in the UK are caused by ionising radiation.[2] Evidence on the effects of ionising radiation came initially from studies of atomic bomb survivors, though more recent studies explore the effects of radiation used to diagnose and treat illness, including X-rays, CT scans and radiotherapy.

Ionising radiation overall generally appears to be more strongly associated with meningioma risk than with glioma risk.[3] The risk of meningioma is increased by 64-510% with each Gray (Gy) of ionising radiation exposure received, data from four cohort studies showed.[3] In one of these studies the effect was not statistically significant.[3] Age at exposure, sex, and time since exposure does not appear to modify the effect of radiation on meningioma risk.[3] The risk of glioma appears to be increased by 8%-56% per Gy, though the upper estimate comes from an atomic bomb survivors study and was not statistically significant.[3] Younger age at exposure confers a stronger effect on glioma risk.[3]

Brain tumour risk is almost tripled in people who received 1-2 CT scans (total average X-ray dose around 60 milligrays (mGy)) during childhood or adolescence, large cohort studies have shown.[4,5]

The average x-ray dose from one head CT scan received up to and including age 20 is 28-44 mGy, depending on age and sex.[4]

People who have ever had dental X-rays taken from the sides of the head (bitewing technique) have double the risk of adult meningioma, a US case-control study showed, though over 90% of both cases and controls had received this type of X-ray.[6]

Radiotherapy for a primary brain tumour (compared with no radiotherapy) was associated with around 55% higher risk of secondary brain tumour, in a study of US patients treated between 1973 and 2002.[7]

People who received radiotherapy for cancer during childhood have a 14-fold higher risk of developing glioma later in life, compared with those who did not receive radiotherapy for their childhood cancer.[8] However this finding, from a large study of British childhood cancer survivors, was not quite statistically significant.[8] Analysing only those children whose primary cancer was in the central nervous system revealed that those treated with radiotherapy (versus those treated without) had a significantly higher risk of subsequent brain tumour.[8]The risk of second primary brain tumour increased linearly with increasing radiotherapy dose, with this effect much stronger for meningioma than glioma.[8]


  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. List of Classifications by cancer sites with sufficient or limited evidence in humans, Volumes 1 to 122. Accessed August 2018.
  2. Brown KF, Rumgay H, Dunlop C, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to known risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the UK overall in 2015. British Journal of Cancer.
  3. Braganza MZ, Kitahara CM, Berrington de González A, et al. Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: a systematic review. Neuro-Oncology 2012; 14(11):1316-24.
  4. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380(9840):499-505.
  5. Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, et al. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(9):2354-60.
  6. Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, et al. Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma. Cancer 2012; 118(18):4530-37.
  7. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Curtis RE, Kry SF, et al. Proportion of second cancers attributable to radiotherapy treatment in adults: a cohort study in the US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12(4):353-60.
  8. Taylor AJ, Little MP, Winter DL, et al. Population-Based Risks of CNS Tumors in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(36):5287-93.
Last reviewed:

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies the role radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (including from wireless phones) in glioma and acoustic neuroma development.[1]

Brain tumour risk is not increased in people who are ever-users of mobile phones, meta-analyses of case-control and cohort studies have shown.[2,3] Whereas brain tumour risk is 33% higher in people who have used a mobile phone for 10 years or more [2,3] Firm conclusions are precluded by evidence limitations linked with the relative infancy of mobile phone technology, the relatively small number of cohort studies and the quality of the included studies.[2,3]

Childhood brain tumour risk is not associated with exposure to magnetic fields (from overhead power lines or broadcast transmitters) during childhood, a pooled analysis and cohort study have shown.[4,5]

Brain tumour risk in adults is not associated with occupational exposure to magnetic fields, large cohort studies in the UK and Netherlands have shown.[6,7]

Last reviewed:

The few workplace exposures for which there is any evidence (albeit very limited) of an association with brain tumour risk - inorganic lead, non-arsenical insecticides, and epichlorohydrin - are thought to account altogether for far less than one per cent of all brain tumour cases in the UK.[1] Meningioma in particular may be associated with lead exposure.[2]

Last reviewed:

Cancer stats explained

See information and explanations on terminology used for statistics and reporting of cancer, and the methods used to calculate some of our statistics.


You are welcome to reuse this Cancer Research UK content for your own work.
Credit us as authors by referencing Cancer Research UK as the primary source. Suggested styles are:

Web content: Cancer Research UK, full URL of the page, Accessed [month] [year].
Publications: Cancer Research UK ([year of publication]), Name of publication, Cancer Research UK.
Graphics (when reused unaltered): Credit: Cancer Research UK.
Graphics (when recreated with differences): Based on a graphic created by Cancer Research UK.

When Cancer Research UK material is used for commercial reasons, we encourage a donation to our life-saving research.
Send a cheque payable to Cancer Research UK to: Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ or

Donate online

We’re now on twitter.
Join the conversation and follow @CRUKHCPs for news, updates and opinion.



We are grateful to the many organisations across the UK which collect, analyse, and share the data which we use, and to the patients and public who consent for their data to be used. Find out more about the sources which are essential for our statistics.