They also looked at whose cancer got worse. This happened in:
- 535 men who had hormone therapy
- 248 men who had hormone therapy and abiraterone
So, having abiraterone alongside hormone therapy reduces the chances of the cancer spreading or coming back.
Side effects
Men who had abiraterone had worse side effects. The most common were:
- changes in some blood test results
- high blood pressure
- breathing problems
Hormone therapy can cause bone problems. But the trial found that abiraterone reduced the risk of serious bone problems by a half.
Results for hormone therapy and celecoxib, some men also had zoledronic acid (Group D and group F)
Men joined this part of the trial between 2005 and 2011. Researchers published these results in 2017.
1,245 men joined this part of the trial. Of those:
- 622 had hormone therapy
- 312 had hormone therapy and celecoxib
- 311 had hormone therapy, celecoxib and zoledronic acid
The researchers did an early analysis of the results in 2012. They looked at how long men lived. This is called overall survival. These results did not show clearly that adding celecoxib with or without zoledronic acid improved overall survival for these men.
So, these parts of the trials closed early and no more men took part.
Results for hormone therapy and radiotherapy to the prostate (Group H)
Men joined this part of the trial between 2013 and 2016. They all had cancer that had spread elsewhere in the body (metastatic cancer). Researchers published these results in 2018.
2,061 men took part. They were put into treatment groups at random:
- 1,029 had hormone therapy
- 1,032 had hormone therapy and radiotherapy
Some men also had docetaxel.
The researchers looked at how long men lived. To do this, they followed the men for a period of 3 years. The researchers found that on average, there was no difference in how long men in the 2 groups lived. So, adding radiotherapy to hormone therapy didn’t improve overall survival.
But they found that radiotherapy helped a specific group of men. The trial team looked at how far the cancer had spread.
In:
- 819 men, the cancer had spread a little bit. This is called low metastatic burden. This means it hadn’t spread beyond lymph nodes
and/or nearby bones
- 1,120 men, the cancer had spread further – this is called a high metastatic burden
- 122 men the trial team didn’t have this information
At 3 years, researchers looked at the number of men living whose cancer had spread a little bit. This was about:
- 8 out of 10 (81%) men who had hormone therapy and radiotherapy (group 1)
- 7 out of 10 (73%) men who had hormone therapy (group 2)
Radiotherapy to the prostate gland also delayed the cancer getting worse. So, having radiotherapy with hormone therapy helped men who had a little cancer spread to live longer.
But they found that radiotherapy didn’t help men live longer if their cancer had spread further at the time of diagnosis.
Side effects
Men who had radiotherapy had more problems with their bladder or bowel. For example, problems passing urine or diarrhoea. These were expected side effects.
Results for trial group G and trial group J
Researchers published these results in 2021. Most of the men had newly diagnosed cancer.
These results looked at men who had prostate cancer that:
- hadn’t spread to another part of the body and
- had a high risk of the cancer spreading
The team analysed the information for 1,974 men. Of those:
- 988 men had hormone therapy alone (group A)
- 986 men had hormone therapy and abiraterone. Some also had enzalutamide (groups G and J)
In group G:
- 455 men had hormone therapy (control group
A)
- 459 men had hormone therapy, abiraterone and the steroid drug prednisolone
In group J:
- 533 men had hormone therapy (control group A)
- 527 men had hormone therapy, abiraterone, prednisolone and enzalutamide. This is combination treatment.
The team followed everyone for about 6 years. They looked at how well treatment worked. To do this they looked at the number of people who had died or whose cancer had spread to another part of the body. At 6 years they found this happened in:
- 306 men who had hormone therapy alone
- 180 men who had hormone therapy and abiraterone, with or without enzalutamide
They also looked at the number of men living at 6 years. They found this was:
- just under 8 out of 10 men (77%) who had hormone therapy
- just under 9 out of 10 men (86%) who had hormone therapy and abiraterone
The team concluded that adding abiraterone to hormone therapy improved outcomes for people. Adding enzalutamide to abiraterone didn’t work any better and the side effects were worse. The team say that abiraterone and prednisolone could be a new standard treatment option for this group of men.
Side effects
Men who had abiraterone had more problems with high blood pressure and mild liver changes. Those who had enzalutamide had more severe problems with high blood pressure, problems getting an erection, tiredness and liver changes.
Main conclusions of the STAMPEDE trial so far
The researchers found that some of the treatments they added to hormone therapy improved overall survival for men whose prostate cancer had spread or had a high risk of spread. These included:
- docetaxel
- abiraterone which also reduces the chances of the cancer spreading or coming back
- radiotherapy in men with less prostate cancer spread (low metastatic burden)
- abiraterone and prednisolone for men whose cancer hadn’t spread to another part of the body
The treatments they added to hormone therapy that didn’t improve overall survival included:
- celecoxib
- zoledronic acid and adding it to docetaxel didn’t add any extra benefit to having docetaxel and hormone therapy
- adding enzalutamide to abiraterone
The results of the STAMPEDE trial have changed the standard of care for men with prostate cancer.
Further results
The trial team are continuing to follow up all the men who are taking part in STAMPEDE. They want to find out more about the long term side effects of treatment.
We plan to update this summary when more results become available.
We have based this summary on information from the research team. The information they sent us has been reviewed by independent specialists (
peer reviewed 
) and published in a medical journal. The figures we quote above were provided by the trial team who did the research. We have not analysed the data ourselves.