Remote consultations have become more commonplace in primary care since the COVID-19 pandemic. They present multiple challenges, as well as benefits, for health professionals and patients to navigate. Emerging evidence indicates that certain patient groups may face additional or more complex barriers to communicating concerning symptoms to their GP via telephone or video.
As the shift from in-person to remote consultation at the start of the pandemic in early 2020 has been sustained to some extent, it is important that GPs and GP practices take steps to harness the benefits, mitigate risks, and adapt the consultation type to patients’ needs. The following information aims to support GP efforts to ensure equitable access to primary care and the timely recognition of suspected cancer signs and symptoms.
The proportion of GP appointments that take place remotely has slowly decreased since mid-2020. In the first few months of lockdown, nearly 50% of appointments in England took place via telephone or video.
Remote consultations may provide a more convenient route to accessing healthcare for some people. However, primary care professionals should be aware that it might not be suitable for everyone, and therefore try to ensure equitable access to care by offering patients a choice of appointment type.
Much of the evidence and data around who remote consultations are most suitable for is situation-specific. Even within groups that typically benefit from remote consultations, this may vary depending on individual factors and preferences. The evidence- base should be used as a guide and health professionals should take an individualised approach when organising appointments.
Evidence and insight suggests that remote consultations may be more appropriate for specific groups, including: younger people, women, those having a follow-up appointment, patients with simple concerns, those living rurally and those with long-term stable conditions. Read the 'Inequalities in access' section for more information about these specific groups.
In a Cancer Research UK Public Poll (December 2022), 54% of respondents were not provided with a choice between face-to-face and remote when arranging an appointment. Qualitative data highlight a strong desire from patients and clinicians to provide or receive a choice of consultation type (face-to-face, video or telephone). It is important not to take a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to consultations, but to recognise that remote consultations are more suitable for certain patient groups.
More research is required to understand the impact of remote consultations in primary care on clinical outcomes.
There are potential benefits to remote consultations, such as facilitating regular and effective use of safety netting tools by health professionals . Furthermore, the results from Cancer Research UK's Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) surveys - run in March 2021 and September 2022 - showed a 5% increase (from 53% to 58%) in patients who reported that their concerns were adequately addressed using remote consultations.
The following section highlights the potential benefits and challenges GPs and patients face around remote consultations, which were identified through an evidence review.
Benefits
Challenges
Improved access for patients requiring translation or support services
Improved access for those living in rural areas
Improved access for people who are housebound
GPs may have easier access to patient groups who find it challenging to access care in-person
More convenient for patients
Variation in access to internet, devices and email
No travel time required
No need for patients to take time off work
Some GPs reported no impact on workload
Some GP concern around potentially increased workload
Remote appointment considered futile if a face-to-face appointment is still necessary
Video consultations considered superior to telephone and face-to-face consultations in some studies
Challenges with technology, such as concerns over security of software
Concerns around privacy when people use video consultations at home
Able to provide images or audio files for patient record
Wi-Fi connections
Limited image quality
Cost for patients and practices
Difficulty integrating new systems and software into current or older IT processes
More timely communication of test results
At home could be considered a better environment to receive serious news
Generally perceived as safe and effective by the public
Diagnostic accuracy may be impaired
Loss of body language cues
Unable to carry out a physical examination
Can be less information rich from both clinicians and patients
Patients potentially raise fewer health concerns
Limits educational opportunities for both patient and GP
The following presents the key groups that may be at a disadvantage by having a remote consultation.
We have collated come tips to support health professionals in getting the most out of remote consultations,
Our prompt sheet can help in your next remote consultation to ensure any potential barriers have been addressed.
Save our prompt sheetRoyal College of General Practitioner: Remote consultation guides
General Medical Council: Infographic from GMC: when remote consultations are appropriate
Nuffield Trust: Further recommendations to reduce inequalities in RCs
Royal College of General Practitioners 10 steps to take in a remote consultation
‘Be Cancer Aware’ for free peer education training
GP Online: Where can GPs access help and support if they are struggling to cope?
Doctors.net.uk remote consultations nanomodules (free login required)
NHS Digital. Appointments in General Practice. [online] NHS Digital. January 2023 and January 2022 summaries. [Accessed 27 February 2023]
Cancer Research UK’s Public Polling Survey. Unpublished findings. Data collected online via YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2,052 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 16th - 19th December 2022. The figures have been weighted and are representative of UK adults (aged 18+). Please note that as of April 2023, the Cancer Research UK Public Poll is referred to as the Cancer Research UK Public Omnibus.
HealthWatch. Locked out: Digitally excluded people’s experiences of remote GP appointments | Healthwatch 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 4].
Friedemann Smith C, Nicholson BD, Hirst Y, Fleming S, Bankhead C. Cancer in the time of COVID: Qualitative study of primary care practice and cancer suspicion during the first three UK lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of General Practice. 2022 Jul 22;BJGP.2021.0719.
Cancer Research UK’s Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) September 2022. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2387 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 20th September - 30th September 2022. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all UK adults (aged 18+)
Atherton et al. “Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study” British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (669): e293-e300. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X694853
Leszczynski. R, et al. Remote consultations: experiences of UK patients with prostate cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future oncology (London, England). 2022 Oct 17 [cited 2022 Nov 4]
Randhawa, Ratan S et al. “An exploration of the attitudes and views of general practitioners on the use of video consultations in a primary healthcare setting: a qualitative pilot study.” Primary health care research & development vol. 20 (2019): e5. doi:10.1017/S1463423618000361
Rosen, R., Wieringa, S., Greenhalgh, T., Leone, C., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., Hughes, G., Moore, L., Shaw, S., Wherton, J. and Byng, R. (2022). Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-Covid-19 pandemic qualitative research. BJGP Open. [online] doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0204.
Shaw SE, Seuren LM, Wherton J, Cameron D, A’Court C, Vijayaraghavan S, et al. Video Consultations Between Patients and Clinicians in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure Services: Linguistic Ethnographic Study of Video-Mediated Interaction. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020 May 11;22(5):e18378.
James HM, Papoutsi C, Wherton J, Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE. Spread, Scale-up, and Sustainability of Video Consulting in Health Care: Systematic Review and Synthesis Guided by the NASSS Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021 Jan 26;23(1):e23775.
Greenhalgh T, Ladds E, Hughes G, Moore L, Wherton J, Shaw SE, et al. Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2022 Feb 16;BJGP.2021.0658.
Greenhalgh T, Rosen R. Remote by default general practice: must we, should we, dare we? British Journal of General Practice. 2021 Mar 26;71(705):149–50.
Powell, R.E., Henstenburg, J.M., Cooper, G., Hollander, J.E. and Rising, K.L. (2017). Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits. The Annals of Family Medicine. 15(3), pp.225–229.
Edwards HB et al. “Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England” BMJ Open 2017;7:e016901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901
Mold, Freda et al. “Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review.” JMIR medical informatics vol. 7,4 e13042. 3 Dec. 2019, doi:10.2196/13042
Parker RF, Figures EL, Paddison CA, Matheson JI, Blane DN, Ford JA. Inequalities in General Practice Remote consultations: A Systematic Review. BJGP Open. 2021 Mar 12;5(3):BJGPO.2021.0040.
Turner A, Morris R, Rakhra D, Stevenson F, McDonagh L, Hamilton F, et al. Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 2021 Oct 20;BJGP.2021.0426.
Archer, S., Calanzani, N., Honey, S., Johnson, M., Neal, R., Scott, S.E. and Walter, F.M. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer assessment in primary care: a qualitative study of GP views. BJGP Open, 5(4), p.BJGPO.2021.0056. doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0056.