A GP is in surgery talking to a patient over the phone.
Health professionals

Remote consultations

Discover practical tips to make the most of remote consultations, helping health professionals deliver effective, patient‑focused care online.

Remote consultations have become more commonplace in primary care since the COVID-19 pandemic. They present multiple challenges, as well as benefits, for health professionals and patients to navigate. Emerging evidence indicates that certain patient groups may face additional or more complex barriers to communicating concerning symptoms to their GP via telephone or video.

As the shift from in-person to remote consultation at the start of the pandemic in early 2020 has been sustained to some extent, it is important that GPs and GP practices take steps to harness the benefits, mitigate risks, and adapt the consultation type to patients’ needs. The following information aims to support GP efforts to ensure equitable access to primary care and the timely recognition of suspected cancer signs and symptoms.

What we know about remote consultations

  • The proportion of GP appointments that take place remotely has slowly decreased since mid-2020. In the first few months of lockdown, nearly 50% of appointments in England took place via telephone or video.

  • Remote consultations may provide a more convenient route to accessing healthcare for some people. However, primary care professionals should be aware that it might not be suitable for everyone, and therefore try to ensure equitable access to care by offering patients a choice of appointment type.

  • Much of the evidence and data around who remote consultations are most suitable for is situation-specific. Even within groups that typically benefit from remote consultations, this may vary depending on individual factors and preferences. The evidence- base should be used as a guide and health professionals should take an individualised approach when organising appointments.

  • Evidence and insight suggests that remote consultations may be more appropriate for specific groups, including: younger people, women, those having a follow-up appointment, patients with simple concerns, those living rurally and those with long-term stable conditions. Read the 'Inequalities in access' section for more information about these specific groups.

  • In a Cancer Research UK Public Poll (December 2022), 54% of respondents were not provided with a choice between face-to-face and remote when arranging an appointment. Qualitative data highlight a strong desire from patients and clinicians to provide or receive a choice of consultation type (face-to-face, video or telephone). It is important not to take a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to consultations, but to recognise that remote consultations are more suitable for certain patient groups.

  • More research is required to understand the impact of remote consultations in primary care on clinical outcomes.

Potential benefits and challenges of remote consultations

There are potential benefits to remote consultations, such as facilitating regular and effective use of safety netting tools by health professionals . Furthermore, the results from Cancer Research UK's Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) surveys - run in March 2021 and September 2022 - showed a 5% increase (from 53% to 58%) in patients who reported that their concerns were adequately addressed using remote consultations.

The following section highlights the potential benefits and challenges GPs and patients face around remote consultations, which were identified through an evidence review.

  • Benefits

  • Challenges

Access

  • Improved access for patients requiring translation or support services

  • Improved access for those living in rural areas

  • Improved access for people who are housebound

  • GPs may have easier access to patient groups who find it challenging to access care in-person

  • More convenient for patients

  • Variation in access to internet, devices and email​

Time/workload

  • No travel time required

  • No need for patients to take time off work

  • Some GPs reported no impact on workload

  • Some GP concern around potentially increased workload

  • Remote appointment considered futile if a face-to-face appointment is still necessary​

Confidentiality

  • Video consultations considered superior to telephone and face-to-face consultations in some studies

  • Challenges with technology, such as concerns over security of software

  • Concerns around privacy when people use video consultations at home

Technology

  • Able to provide images or audio files for patient record​

  • Wi-Fi connections

  • Limited image quality

  • Cost for patients and practices

  • Difficulty integrating new systems and software into current or older IT processes

Quality of care

  • More timely communication of test results

  • At home could be considered a better environment to receive serious news

  • Generally perceived as safe and effective​ by the public

  • Diagnostic accuracy may be impaired

  • Loss of body language cues

  • Unable to carry out a physical examination

  • Can be less information rich from both clinicians and patients

  • Patients potentially raise fewer health concerns

  • Limits educational opportunities for both patient and GP​

Main concerns for remote consultations

Inequalities in access

The following presents the key groups that may be at a disadvantage by having a remote consultation.

Top tips for remote consultations

We have collated come tips to support health professionals in getting the most out of remote consultations,

Our prompt sheet can help in your next remote consultation to ensure any potential barriers have been addressed.

Save our prompt sheet

Find more resources

References

  1. Arrow return up icon

    NHS Digital. Appointments in General Practice. [online] NHS Digital. January 2023 and January 2022 summaries. [Accessed 27 February 2023]

  2. Arrow return up icon

    Cancer Research UK’s Public Polling Survey. Unpublished findings. Data collected online via YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2,052 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 16th - 19th December 2022. The figures have been weighted and are representative of UK adults (aged 18+). Please note that as of April 2023, the Cancer Research UK Public Poll is referred to as the Cancer Research UK Public Omnibus.

  3. Arrow return up icon
  4. Arrow return up icon

    Friedemann Smith C, Nicholson BD, Hirst Y, Fleming S, Bankhead C. Cancer in the time of COVID: Qualitative study of primary care practice and cancer suspicion during the first three UK lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of General Practice. 2022 Jul 22;BJGP.2021.0719.

  5. Arrow return up icon

    Cancer Research UK’s Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) September 2022. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2387 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 20th September - 30th September 2022. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all UK adults (aged 18+)

  6. Arrow return up icon

    Atherton et al. “Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study” British Journal of General Practice 2018; 68 (669): e293-e300. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X694853

  7. Arrow return up icon

    Leszczynski. R, et al. Remote consultations: experiences of UK patients with prostate cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future oncology (London, England). 2022 Oct 17 [cited 2022 Nov 4]

  8. Arrow return up icon

    Randhawa, Ratan S et al. “An exploration of the attitudes and views of general practitioners on the use of video consultations in a primary healthcare setting: a qualitative pilot study.” Primary health care research & development vol. 20 (2019): e5. doi:10.1017/S1463423618000361

  9. Arrow return up icon
  10. Arrow return up icon

    Rosen, R., Wieringa, S., Greenhalgh, T., Leone, C., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., Hughes, G., Moore, L., Shaw, S., Wherton, J. and Byng, R. (2022). Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-Covid-19 pandemic qualitative research. BJGP Open. [online] doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0204.

  11. Arrow return up icon

    Shaw SE, Seuren LM, Wherton J, Cameron D, A’Court C, Vijayaraghavan S, et al. Video Consultations Between Patients and Clinicians in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure Services: Linguistic Ethnographic Study of Video-Mediated Interaction. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020 May 11;22(5):e18378.

  12. Arrow return up icon

    James HM, Papoutsi C, Wherton J, Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE. Spread, Scale-up, and Sustainability of Video Consulting in Health Care: Systematic Review and Synthesis Guided by the NASSS Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021 Jan 26;23(1):e23775.

  13. Arrow return up icon

    Greenhalgh T, Ladds E, Hughes G, Moore L, Wherton J, Shaw SE, et al. Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2022 Feb 16;BJGP.2021.0658.

  14. Arrow return up icon

    Greenhalgh T, Rosen R. Remote by default general practice: must we, should we, dare we? British Journal of General Practice. 2021 Mar 26;71(705):149–50.

  15. Arrow return up icon

    Powell, R.E., Henstenburg, J.M., Cooper, G., Hollander, J.E. and Rising, K.L. (2017). Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits. The Annals of Family Medicine. 15(3), pp.225–229.

  16. Arrow return up icon

    Edwards HB et al. “Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England” BMJ Open 2017;7:e016901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901

  17. Arrow return up icon

    Mold, Freda et al. “Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review.” JMIR medical informatics vol. 7,4 e13042. 3 Dec. 2019, doi:10.2196/13042

  18. Arrow return up icon

    Parker RF, Figures EL, Paddison CA, Matheson JI, Blane DN, Ford JA. Inequalities in General Practice Remote consultations: A Systematic Review. BJGP Open. 2021 Mar 12;5(3):BJGPO.2021.0040.

  19. Arrow return up icon

    Turner A, Morris R, Rakhra D, Stevenson F, McDonagh L, Hamilton F, et al. Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 2021 Oct 20;BJGP.2021.0426.

  20. Arrow return up icon

    Archer, S., Calanzani, N., Honey, S., Johnson, M., Neal, R., Scott, S.E. and Walter, F.M. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer assessment in primary care: a qualitative study of GP views. BJGP Open, 5(4), p.BJGPO.2021.0056. doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0056.