A trial looking at using different scans to see how well treatment works for head and neck cancer

Cancer type:

Head and neck cancers
Laryngeal cancer
Mouth (oral) cancer
Nasal and paranasal sinus cancer
Nasopharyngeal cancer
Pharyngeal cancer

Status:

Results

Phase:

Other

This trial looked at whether using DW-MRI scans and PET-CT scans were useful to see how well treatment worked for head and neck cancer. 

It was for people who had treatment at Guy’s Hospital in London. They all had a type of head and neck cancer called squamous cell cancer Open a glossary item (SCC).

This trial was open for people to join between 2014 and 2017. The team published the results in journals in 2021.
 

More about this trial

Doctors often use PET-CT scans after chemotherapy or radiotherapy so they can see how well treatment worked. PET-CT scans measure the activity of cells, so doctors can see where cancer cells are growing. Sometimes healthy cells become inflamed after treatment. These can look like cancer cells on the scan.

They also use MRI scans to see what the area of cancer looks like and how big it is. Sometimes areas of scar tissue can look like cancer cells on the scan.

Doctors wanted to find a more accurate way of seeing whether there were any cancer cells left after treatment. 

They thought that a type of MRI scan called diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) might be useful. DW-MRI scans measure the water movement in the body. 

Everyone taking part in this trial had a DW-MRI before and after treatment.

The main aim of this trial was to find out whether DW-MRI scans are helpful to see how well treatment for head and neck cancer worked.
 

Summary of results

The team found that the DWI-MRI and PET-CT scans were helpful to see how well treatment worked for many head and neck cancers. 

Trial design
65 people took part in this trial. Everyone had a DWI-MRI and PET-CT scan at 6 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment. 

Results
The team looked at whether the scans could show who might be alive and not have any sign of their cancer 2 years after treatment. They found that the scans done at 6 weeks and 12 weeks helped to show this. 

Some people with a head and neck cancer would have had a previous infection with the human papilloma virus Open a glossary item (HPV). The team looked at whether this made a difference to how well the scans worked.  

They found that for a group of people the scans weren’t helpful. These were people with cancer of the throat just behind the mouth oropharynx Open a glossary item who had HPV. 

Conclusion
The team concluded that DWI-MRI and PET-CT scans could show how well treatment might work. But the scans may not be useful for people who have had HPV. 

This was a small trial. Researchers need to do further trials with larger numbers of people to find out whether:

•    doing a DWI-MRI scan 12 weeks after treatment can show how well treatment might work
•    HPV does affect how well DWI-MRI scan might work

There are ongoing studies which will help make clear the role of DWI-MRI scan has in predicting whether people respond to treatment.

More detailed information
There is more information about this research in the references below. 

Please note, these articles are not in plain English. They have been written for healthcare professionals and researchers.

Correlations between DW-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following definitive chemo-radiotherapy

Steve Connor, Cherry Sit and others

Cancer Reports, 2021. Volume 4, Issue e1360, Pages 1-14.

Apparent diffusion coefficient agreement and reliability using different region of interest methods for the evaluation of head and neck cancer post chemo- radiotherapy

Mustafa Anjari, Amrita Guha and others

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology,2021. Volume 50, Issue 20200579. Pages 1-8.

MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?

S. E. J. Connor, C. Burd and others

European Radiology, 2021. Volume 31, Pages 9273–9286.

The impact of Human Papilloma Virus status on the prediction of head and neck cancer chemoradiotherapy outcomes using the pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient

Steve Connor, Mustafa Anjari and others

British Journal of Radiology, 2021. Volume 95: 20210333.

The ability of postchemoradiotherapy DWI ADCmean and 18FFDG SUVmax to predict treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer: impact of human papilloma virus oropharyngeal cancer status

S. Connor, C. Sit and others

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2021. Volume 147, Pages 2323–2336.

Where this information comes from

We have based this summary on the information in the articles above. These have been reviewed by independent specialists (peer reviewed Open a glossary item) and published in medical journals. We have not analysed the data ourselves. As far as we are aware, the links we list above are active and the articles are free and available to view.

Recruitment start:

Recruitment end:

How to join a clinical trial

Please note: In order to join a trial you will need to discuss it with your doctor, unless otherwise specified.

Please note - unless we state otherwise in the summary, you need to talk to your doctor about joining a trial.

Chief Investigator

Dr Steve Connor
Professor Vicky Goh

Supported by

Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Royal College of Radiologists (Kodak Radiology Research Bursary)

Other information

Journal articles
Correlations between DW-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following definitive chemo-radiotherapy
Steve Connor, Cherry Sit and others
Cancer Reports, 2021. Volume 4, Issue e1360, Pages 1-14.

Apparent diffusion coefficient agreement and reliability using different region of interest methods for the evaluation of head and neck cancer post chemo- radiotherapy
Mustafa Anjari, Amrita Guha and others
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology,2021. Volume 50, Issue 20200579. Pages 1-8.

MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?
S. E. J. Connor, C. Burd and others
European Radiology, 2021. Volume 31, Pages 9273–9286.

The impact of Human Papilloma Virus status on the prediction of head and neck cancer chemoradiotherapy outcomes using the pre-treatment apparent
diffusion coefficient

STEVE CONNOR, MUSTAFA ANJARI and others
British Journal of Radiology, 2021. Volume 95: 20210333.

The ability of post‑chemoradiotherapy DWI ADCmean and 18F‑FDG
SUVmax to predict treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer:
impact of human papilloma virus oropharyngeal cancer status

S. Connor, C. Sit and others
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2021. Volume 147, Pages 2323–2336.

Where this information comes from    
We have based this summary on the information in the articles above. These have been reviewed by independent specialists peer reviewed Open a glossary item and published in medical journals. We have not analysed the data ourselves. As far as we are aware, the links we list above are active and the articles are free and available to view.
 

If you have questions about the trial please contact our cancer information nurses

Freephone 0808 800 4040

Last review date

CRUK internal database number:

12501

Please note - unless we state otherwise in the summary, you need to talk to your doctor about joining a trial.

Charlie took part in a trial to try new treatments

A picture of Charlie

“I think it’s really important that people keep signing up to these type of trials to push research forward.”

Last reviewed:

Rate this page:

No votes yet
Thank you!
We've recently made some changes to the site, tell us what you think