Cancer Research UK logo.
SearchDonate
  • Search
Committee members in a meeting.

How we make funding decisions

Our funding process is designed to identify and support cancer research with the greatest potential for patient benefit. From submission to decision, we follow a rigorous, fair, and transparent process to ensure funding aligns with our strategy and research priorities. Contact us with any questions about our peer review or funding decisions.

Email us

Overview of our funding review process

Peer review forms the basis of our funding decisions. Depending on the funding you’ve applied for, this can include assessment by an expert review panel, or an interview.

Final funding decisions are made by our funding committees or the relevant review board.

Explore our guide to assessing grant applications

Our funding committees

Our funding committees oversee the peer review process and align decisions with our research strategy. Each committee has a specific remit. 

Research Careers Committee

This committee focusses on supporting career development for early and mid-career researchers.

Discovery Research Committee

This committee funds basic discovery and early translational research.

Early Detection and Diagnosis Research Committee

This committee funds research into ways detect and diagnose cancer at the earliest possible point.

Prevention and Population Research Committee

This committee funds research on cancer primary prevention and population studies across all cancer types and stages to improve understanding of cancer risk, incidence, and outcomes.

Clinical Research Committee 

This committee funds investigator-led clinical research and studies supporting or enabling clinical trials.

Our review principles and standards

We provide overall guidance and requirements for our committees, Expert Review Panels and independent peer reviewers. Each committee may also have additional criteria or standards specific to their funding remit. 

Code of practice

Our code of practice applies to anyone reviewing or advising on funding applications, to ensure that review is carried out objectively, impartially and reflects the highest standards of governance. 

Read our code of practice(PDF, 213 KB)

Terms of reference

We set out the key responsibilities and membership requirements for our funding committees and expert review panels in our general terms of reference documents.

Read our terms of reference for funding committees(PDF, 190 KB)

Read our terms of reference for expert review panels(PDF, 102 KB)

Conflicts of interest policy

If you are a member of a funding committee, expert review panel or other peer reviewer, you must declare any conflicts of interest that would affect your review of a grant application.

Read our conflicts of interest policy

External standards and principles

As a member of the Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC), we follow their high standards and recommended peer review principles.

We also follow the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). This means that when we evaluate researchers and their ability to carry out proposed research, we look at the value and impact of all their work.

When we do look at research publications, we focus more on the content and its impact in the field rather than the publication metrics or where it was published.

Learn more about AMRC's peer review principles

Learn more about DORA

Our expert peer reviewers

Our peer reviewers play a vital role in shaping our funding decisions.

These expert reviewers are external, independent, leading scientists, clinicians, health policy specialists and patient representatives. We invite them to sit on our panels and committees and regularly call for new members to join to ensure we have the appropriate and relevant expertise to review the applications submitted to us.

Learn more about our expert peer review process

Scientific Executive Board

Our funding committees are overseen by the Scientific Executive Board, who are responsible for developing and implementing our scientific strategy.

In exceptional circumstances, the board also consider approaches for funding in areas of high strategic priority that do not easily fall within the scope or scale of our funding committees and schemes. If you would like to discuss opportunities like this, please contact us via the email above.

Find out more about the Scientific Executive Board

Observing funding panels and committees

We offer early- to mid-career researchers the opportunity to observe panel and committee meetings across our funding remit. Anyone can apply but we offer priority places to individuals from underrepresented groups.   

Find out more about eligibility and how to apply

You might also be interested in

Researchers in the lab looking at a slide.

Our research strategy

Our strategy shapes how we'll discover more about the mechanisms of how cancer develops and progresses to unlock new and better ways to prevent, detect and treat it.

Researcher working in a lab.

Funding opportunities

We fund individual projects and fellowships, large-scale team science programmes, multidisciplinary collaborations and international consortia.